Official Discord for 1stAmender - Click to Join Us!

The Non-Aggression Principle - Why Libertarians Find it So Important

Loves to blog and debate


Tags: libertarianism  non-aggression principle  NAP  

Loves to blog and debate

The Non-Aggression Principle - Why Libertarians Find it So Important published by The 1st Amender
Writer Rating: 2.0000
Posted on 2019-02-12
Writer Description: Loves to blog and debate
This writer has written 210 articles.


The non-aggression principle. For those that do not know what it is, it's very simple. You do not act with aggression unless acted with aggression. Often times memes on the internet regarding anarcho-capitalism and libertarianism will disregard the non-aggression principle. Memes like this to dismantle the non-aggression principle (NAP) are common:

Image result for libertarian meme smiling face

The common issue that I have with these funny little pictures is that it often will aggress against the non-aggression principle. The issue I have with the above picture is that you assumed that children have the ability of consent. That you are in-fact aggressing on children by forcing them to consent. And to point that if someone is physically on your property, given that the only aggression being that they are on your property and no more, you can safely say any person with "reason" would not shoot the child.

So why do Libertarians hold the NAP in such high regard? What value could the NAP possibly give us in this modern day? Simple. The concept of the NAP goes back thousands of years. Yet we don't call it the NAP. There is the existence of the Golden rule: "Treat other people the way you would like to be treated with respect." and the famous verse in the Bible: "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." are all examples of NAP. That rational people can effectively hold this creed in highest value regardless of race, creed, sex, affiliation, etc.

This is a beautiful premise that lays hold into the values a Libertarian holds. That they simply do not want to harm you. That they would actively avoid harm. And that the same principle can then be placed at the standard of the government, society, companies, etc. Anything that involves the existence of humans running it requires the NAP rule. Even in the earliest recesses of humanity, we can think of natural innate beliefs that someone would not generally want to cause harm unto another. And unless aggressed on, that you would apply the necessary amount of force to prevent or stop the aggression from happening.

   

Sources:
self-written

Article Rating: 1.0000



You have the right to stay anonymous in your comments, share at your own discretion.

Anonymous: 2019-06-11 11:30:16 ID:3275

>And unless aggressed on, that you would apply the necessary amount of force to prevent or stop the aggression from happening.
Of course, this is delusional nonsense since in any real AnCap or hard libertarian society would devolve into massive armed cartels imposing on your non aggression at will. This is what is so autistic about AnCap. People aren't going to try and live strong and independent lives upholding the virtues of the golden rule and respecting people's self defined boundaries. They're going to gang up and steal your shit. And then you'll gang up and we'll be right back into tribalism, feeding full circle into formalized states.

Kaius Foxx: 2019-11-15 05:30:39 ID:3422

The NAP is the most golden and universal rule of them all.